FLAGGERS OR FREE RADICALS?
I’ve noticed how difficult it is to “reach” some of my blogs and find myself wondering if a stealthy censorship is going on within the internet “community.” What is censored and by whom? What is censored is any matter that contains too much pith in it that simultaneously offends one or more categories. In regard to this last matter, the form tends to be one category which is nurtured by another, or supported, or otherwise served. These form clusters of subcategories, which surround the main category, as destroyers surround battleships or aircraft carriers. Or they may be likened to chicks peeping under the wing of a mother hen.
Organized “flaggers” would not be perceived by others. Most people today are sufficiently miseducated that they side with the malefactors, proclaiming them to be victims. In this way they call to mind the words of John Milton’s satan: “Evil, be thou my good!” Except they don’t have Satan’s ability to understand the evil they do. They filmly believe their views to be good.
What subject is numero uno in regard to taboo inculcation? Frankly, any subject that Jews hold dear, or are fiercely propagandizing, such as the alleged Holocaust of Jews. Another subject Jews don’t like to have publicly discussed is their involvement in “death trains” in Hungary. Naturally, the fact that all the major Soviet concentration camps were headed by Jews, during the very period when as many as 60 million people were untimely ushered into the grave, is not welcomed either. Nor the not so strange affinity of Jews and the leading forms of communism. And so on.
The word “devil” as appears in the Bible is from a Greek word, meaning “Accuser.” Jews have made entire organizations that are based on this principle of loudly accusing. This does not mean that Jews are unaware of the utility of the “Iago” approach, which so undermined the happiness of Othello. It is simply that in an America of waxing ignorance and fecklessness, the loud, repeated accusation will overwhelm. (For what individual will hold his ground, unless he possesses righteousness?)
The Anti-Defamation League of B’Nai B’Rith [ADL] has been shown as far back as Sen. Tenney’s visit to their Washington, D.C., “digs,” to be operating what appeared to be a massive spying, indexing, dossier creating, propaganda mill, operating in all forms of the news/entertainment/arts and literary organizations. In the 1970s it was discovered that the ADL had attempted to obtain dossiers on some 12,000 individuals, apparently not stopping with attempted corruption of police to advice their spying efforts.
The wealth and power of the ADL has ever grown, regardless of their behavior. Neither the Roman Catholic nor the Protestant branches of “Christianity” is bothered at all. For many Christians Jews are “the apple of God’s eyes.” Hence, they can do no wrong. God always steers them in the right direction, these Christians suppose. However, Moses himself could not smite the stony brows of such Christians and bring forth the waters of truth.
Within B’Nai B’Rith, itself, there exists, or did exist in the 1990s, a masonic-like lodge, which was entitled “the Ad Lodge.” It was exclusively Jewish (as is the international lodge of B’Nai B’Rith) and sought to influence media companies by means of ad dollars, much of which they controlled. So, in the case of a non-Jewish media mogul, what he lacked in conviction on an issue of concern to Jews, he more than made up for it with his desire to keep the money coming into his business. That means cooperation. Rich non-Jews don’t seem to have any strong conviction at all, but “me-too” what Jews think best. That is also what members of the academnic-intellectuual-creative complex do.
The organizations of Jewry that spy and accuse are many. Spying is one of the oldest areas of especial interests to Jews, and they have often provided their services to various kings in various places.
Now, it doesn’t matter a bit that most Jews are not so engaged in spying (assuming that’s a fair appraisal); what matters is that Jewish organizations have been doing it for a long time, have grown much wealthier over time, and now attempt to “stifle” all critics. Incredibly, non-Jews actually support Jews self-serving ploys. For Jews it means power and vindication. For Christians it means that the “high heavens” haved graced their heads with dunces’ hats.
This blog was meant to suggest, utilizing the slightest bit of evidence, the bold proposition that ADL operatives (or kindred, organizational types) go through the internet “bombing” blogs, websites, advertisements, etc., by means of “flagging,” as well as other methods. Since most of the sites that are “bombed” are on larger web-hosting sites that are well-represented at the ownership/operational levels by Jews, there is also reason to suppose that there would be sympathy to an ADL “pitch” that a blog was “objectionable.” After all, what Jew has ever criticized the “nazi hunters” for dragging some antique man all around the world to stand trial for working, somehow or other, at a “death camp?” Factor in the evidence of a scientific and engineering sort, which make utterly clear that there never was a “Holocaust,” and you begin to understand the nature of the beast.
The late Menachem Begin sneered that Jews “invented terrorism.” It is my thesis by blog that they are practicing it on the internet (while probably blaming it on others, such as “far-out extremists”). They are as injurious to the cyber-body as “free radicals” are to the inner workings of the body. And a dog can be as dangerous as his master. In Europe university professors are thrown in jail for “denying the Holocaust.” Given Jewry’s track record on the one hand, and weak-willed non-Jews’ track record on the other, there is no extremism to the observation that dossiers of blog-writers may be accumulating for the day of revenge. Most likely some fine Purim.
All rights reserved. Nomoonnight, 2008
