GENOCIDE 4: “DEATH CAMPS?”
In an era when most American men either worry whether the cocoa butter creme they apply to their faces has enough vitamin E, there is minimal interest in truth in history. Still, history fully laid forth is important to some, still. To paraphrase Mr. George Orwell: Those who control the present, control the past; and those who control the past, control the future. By using skillfully material omissions, the “agents of change,” representing the ruling Resident Evil in schools, entertainment, and the media, have creating in a snowballing fashion three generations of “lobotomized” citizens, who rarely question anything that their rulers propose. Rather, they immediately begin to “bark” at anyone who challenges the “self-evident truths” espoused by the ruling circles. Americans are disturbed by anyone who states something contrary to what they have “learned” at school, church or television news programs. Their lower lips jut out, and they yell: “I hate you!” or “I don’t believe a word you say!”
The “truth-bearer” is typically a brief sojourner in any one spot (or period of time), as such are likely to be “ridden out of town on a rail.”
Jews are the most effective opponents of truth. In fairness to Jews, they do attached a stronger “witness” status to their abstractive conception of the world than to the material world itself, regardless of any claims to being “scientific materialist.” Hence, when the material world denies the Jewish vision, then Jews are compelled to redefine the material world so as to make it at one with their abstract vision. They utilize a sort of Procrustean Bed to “lop off” inconvenient truths.
So it is in regard to Jewish claims of a “holocaust” of six million” Jews. This is a clearly impossible event on the basis of scientific and engineering analyses. Therefore, say learned Jews, there must be a problem with science and engineering, if it denies the “truth” of the holocaust of six million Jews.
This has led to the “World Jewish Nation” (”WJN”), composed of a global archipelago of communities, mostly in metropolises in major nations, whose center is Jerusalem, demanding of local “colonial governments” in which they reside to pass legislation banning denial of the holocaust of six million Jews, to forbid criticism of the State of Israel (sic) on such grounds as “racism” or behaving like “Nazis,” and to ban any criticism of Jews for having “too much” power or for “controlling” the media.
Consistent with this Jewish determination to filter information, providing their subject paisano “all the truth fit to print,” Sen. Joseph Lieberman (Independent-Conn.) is attempting to put together legislation to monitor and perhaps, if warranted, restrict the internet from “harmful” data. His ostensible target is terrorism, but anyone familiar with Jewish modus operandi knows that this is the pretext, likely to win support, by which to enable the fedcops to silence critics of Jewry/Israeli State. Consider:
“Lieberman–who spearheaded the creation of the Department of Homeland Security–recently orchestrated the release of a report that was designed to further push for enactment of a proposed Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act (S.1959).
“Critics perceive this new ,measure to be another police state-style measure in the mode of the controversial ‘Patriot Act,’ which was likewise Lieberman’s insidious brainchild….
“It is no coincidence that Jewish lobby organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, which played a major behind-the-scenes role in the crafting of the Patriot Act, has also been raising fears of ‘homegrown’ and ‘domestic’ terrorism….
“Writing at antiwar.com, Ross Vachon described Lieberman well and in no uncertain terms, calling him ‘the man whose loyalty to a foreign country is unquestionably deep and destructive.’ He said that the absolute underlying foundation of Lieberman’s foreign policy is ‘using America to annihilate the neighbors Israel won’t make peace with.’ “ [AMERICAN FREE PRESS, June 2, 2008, p.8, Spotlight on Congress]
This article, parenthetically, mentions the close friendship of Joseph Liebermam and John McCain.
In other articles at other times, AFP has mentioned that both Senator Joseph Lieberman and Supreme Court Justice Ginzburg read the Talmud daily. Interestingly, one finds in the Talmud that it gives its blessing to deceiving the “goi.” Considers:
” ‘The name of God is not profaned when it is not known by the Goi that the Jew has lied.’ A marginal note to Babha Kama (113a), explaining this section’s qualification of Rabbi Akibha.
“And further on, the Babha Kama (113b) says: ‘The name of God is not profaned when, for example, a Jew lies to a Goi by saying: I gave something to your father, but he is dead; you must return it to me, as long as the Goi does not know that you are lying.’” [THE TALMUD UNMASKED, Rev. I.B. Pranaitis, p.74]
With this sort of background, and realising that Lieberman and Ginzburg are only a tiny portion of the powerfully situated Jews, who are ready, willing, and able to “lie like the Devil” to advance the Jewish World Agenda, resulting one day in tikkum olam (”repair of the world”) and the commencement of the Jewish messianic era, it is hardly surprising that such a “great wall of deceit” has been built by Jewry in regard to the “holocaust.”
Jews, having provided most of Protestantism with their present perception of “Christianity,” turned toward World War II to provide the theological framework for accepting Jews collectively as the promised “messiah.” After carefully studying Yahshua, Jewry descerned a way to supplant the Messiah of Israel with the Jewish messiah.
The idea Jewry proposed was, in effect, that Jewry had been annihilated by “Amalek” (Nazis) but had miraculously “risen from the dead” in glory to be a blessing to the world, restoring it (eventually) to “paradisial” splendor. The “six million” is an expression which undoubtedly carries crucial numerological import. Hence, it has an occult, abstractionist essence, which is a sine qua non to Jewish messianism. Hence, Jewry will tolerate no variation from this number, even if scientifically and engineeringly impossible, according to known records and accounts.
Parenthetically, the “antichrist” of Revelation is a person or institution that offers itself as a substitute or replacement for Christ. How damned are those that act as “enablers” in this process! By not denouncing the “holocaust” deceit, the Vatican and Protestant leadership have become enablers, losing Christ’s children in the process. It would have been better had they not been born.
Now, just because Jewry is benighted, must the world in general also be “children of the dark?” Putting aside hopeless “dogs of the Jews,” such as Katie Curic (CBS News) and Jack Germond, the “Humpty-Dumpty” press and television incarnation of the word “banal,” as well as the rest of the bulk of major media reporters/observers, one can venture forth in search of the true “light-bearers.” Consider:
“The victims were led to gas chambers, which were disguised as shower baths, and were deceived by being handed soap and a towel. But what for? Who takes a shower holding a towel in his hands? [THE LUFTL REPORT (1992), Walter Luftl, p.6]
Indeed! Here we see the slipshod workmanship for which Jews were notorious in Europe. Their lies become immediately apparent. Only a Hollywood actor would overlook this sort of absurdity. But let us continue with the very interesting report from Mr. Luftl, a prominent Austrian engineer, who is a court-recognized expert engineer and heads a large engineering firm.
“Preliminary note: The ‘Gerstein Report’ discussed here is the ‘confession’ of an ‘informed’ SS man, and is a cornerstone of the Holocaust literature….
“There were [according to Gerstein] 700-800 persons–that is, an average of 750 persons–in the chamber, weighing a average of 60 kilograms, and with a density of approximately one [sic], a volume of 45 cubic meters (m3).
“How the people could be ‘packed’ into a room measuring 47.5 cubic meters is a mystery. Such an attempt would be absurd and unthinkable. At the most, ten persons can fit into one square meter. (Using rather slender persons, experimentation has usually yielded a result of eight persons.)
“Two hundred and fifty persons displace 15 cubic meters, which means an air volume of 32.5 cubic meters (47.5-15 = 32.5). The breathing time volume (BTV) of these people will amount, on the average, to 7.5 liters per minute. Therefore, 250 people will require 250 x 60 x 7.5/1000 = 112.5 cubic meters of air to breathe in one hour. In 32.5 cubic meters of room space, this air, therefore, will pass through the lungs of the people shut up in that room 3.45 times in one hour. It will therefore take 17 minutes and 20 seconds for the air to pass through their lungs once.
“Dry air contains approximately 21 percent oxygen and only traces of carbon dioxide. Exhaled air contains approximately 15 percent oxygen and 4.4 percent carbon dioxide, as well as six percent water vapor. After 34 minutes and 40 seconds, the air will have passed through their lungs a second time, and will now contain approximately ten percent oxygen, but already eight percent carbon dioxide. After a (hypothetical) third passage through the lungs, the air in the chamber would contain approximately five percent oxygen, but at least eleven percent carbon dioxide, after only 52 minutes.
“But unconsciousness and anoxia would have appeared after 30 to 45 minutes. And five minutes of anoxia means brain death.
“Therefore, the people in the ‘gas chamber’ could not, first of all, have waited two hours and 49 minutes for the diesel engine to start. Nor could they have cried and sobbed after 50 minutes of hopeless waiting. They would certainly have been dead by that time. And how could 700-800 people–assuming they could be packed or forced into the chamber at all–have breathed at all if they were ‘packed together?’ They would have been unconscious soon after the doors closed, and in another five minutes they would have been dead.
“The Gerstein Report is no report, but a whopping lie….” [supra. pp.11-12]
As most of the testimony given by Nazis on trial for war crimes had been tortured, mostly by Jews appointed to various Nuremberg administrations and agencies related to the prosecution, who had themselves fled to the West and had an “axe to grind,” the obviously fraudulent testimony is no great surprise. Even then, the Jews involved realised that a number, such as six million, was contemplated, so they went about sticking the suitably large numbers into the scenarios. Without technical ability but confident in their power to make it stick, they proceeded with these zany claims–which resulted in the murder of Nazis by the Allies, because they believed that crime paid. In this array of “death camps,” Nuremberg Trials (and legal precedences), tortures, murders, reparations, psychological warfare against generations of German children, post-WWII para-genocide against the German people, claims of “moral hegemony,” and the securing of the State of Israel (sic) are some of the major salients.
Is it just and right? No, it is not.
Another of several interesting areas to which engineering principles might be applied and are discussed in the Luftl Report involves the chimneys of the crematory ovens. Consider:
“In the Holocaust literature one can often read reports of eyewitnesses who saw dense smoke coming from the chimneys of the crematories in German concentration camps. Inmates also often saw flames ‘many meters long’ shooting out of the chimneys. People with especially good eyesight even saw such phenomena from as far as 20 kilometers from Auschwitz.
“Mauthausen ‘historian’ and state official [Hofrat] Hans Marsalek writes (in the book Das war Mauthausen, p.14, point 18, ‘Bunker’): ‘…Below the bunker was the first crematorium. Its fire burned day and night, and the glare of the flame shooting out of the chimney could be seen far away in the Danube valley…’
“All these ‘eyewitnesses’ (who are now commonly referred to as ‘contemporary witnesses’) are telling conscious untruths when they report such things, unless they are the victims of an optical illusion. Only they themselves know if they are lying.” [supra, pp.16-17]
I do want to interrupt Mr. Luftl to recall to the readers mind the curious Talmudic notion about deceit. But now, let’s continue with the Luftl Report.
“First, we will make two demands upon the reader’s knowledge of geometry and sense of logic:
” 1. Geometry: From a distance of 20 kilometers, even over the Neusiedlersee [Neusiedl Lake] (which is quite flat), the influence of the curvature of the earth is enough to cut off any possible visual contact between the eye of the observer and any high chimney or high flame, even from a high vantage point (such as the roof of a railroad car, since the ‘eyewitnesses’ were railroad workers). In the vicinity of Auschwitz, furthermore, there were gently rolling hills, which were nevertheless sufficient to shield the installations from view.
“2. Logic: Why did the Germans lay a smoke screen over the ‘Hermann Goring Works’ in Linz, and order strict blackouts if, at the same time, according to Marsalek) ‘…the glare of the flame shooting out of the chimney could be seen far away in the Danube valley…?’ This would have been a beacon for U.S. bombers….
“In the book Bauentwurfslehre ['Textbook on Construction Design'] by Ernst Neufert (Ullstein Fachverlag, 1962), p.423, one can read: ‘Cremation takes place in special ovens which are coke-fired, electrically-fired (cremation of as body requires about 45 Kw energy), or gas-fired…[and is] entirely free of smoke [Staub] or odor.
“(This puts an end to the fairy tales of noticeable odor of the cremated corpses!)
” ‘[The cremation] takes place in dry air heated to 900-1,000 degrees [Celsius], that is without the flame coming into contact with the dead [body]. The oven is heated beforehand for two to three hours, and the cremation process itself requires between an hour and a quarter an hour and a half.
“Thus, technology also establishes that the crematory capacity could never have kept pace with the number of bodies in the ‘genocidal mass gassings of millions of people,’ and that therefore the bodies could not have been disposed of in sufficient quantity by burning.’ “ [supra, pp.17-18]
Besides the customary lunacy of Jewish claims in regard to the “holocaust,” such as flames from crematories glowing through the thick smoke 24 hours a day, as if this equipment was immortal, needing no down-time for cleaning nor for spare parts as machinery breaks down on strain of constant usage. Once again, I sense the “half-baked” idea ruling, as Jews try to make plausible their preposterous claims. Let’s hear more from this interesting report, which brought Mr. Luftl under considerable pressure, as Jews tried to intimidate not only Mr. luftl but ANY Light-bearer who challenged the Jewish night.
“Contrary to popular belief, corpses are not combustible materials. Cremation of bodies requires large quantities of fuel. (With a wooden coffin of 40 kilograms, and assuming 50 percent total efficiency of combustion, 45 kilowatts [of electrical energy] corresponds to about 15 kilograms of coke, or eight cubic meters of natural gas.)
“The cremation of four million people using coke would require at least 50 kilograms [per body], which would mean about 200,000 tons of coke!
“It is also senseless (and technically impossible) to speak of cremating several corpses at the same time in the same oven (witnesses have claimed as many as ten bodies at a time!), because this would exceed the capacity of the oven.
“And what about the flame? Coke is a short-flamed fuel. The flame could not even exceed the confines of the burning chamber. In addition, there is a short exhaust channel, the flue, between the oven and the chimney. The chimney only comes after that. So, using [such] short-flamed solid fuels, there wouldn’t be any ‘flames.’ At most, there would be exhaust fumes at a temperature of 180 degrees Celsius. Otherwise, the chimney would soon be ruined. Therefore, after traversing eight or ten meters of chimney, no flame could be visible outside. (The chimney length is determined by the required draw, not the length of the flames.) Not even a reflection would be visible because it would be lost in the flue. I always wonder why the judges who believed such testmony never at least asked a chimney sweep about this, even if they didn’t consult an expert.” [supra, p18]
And what a pithy subject! Jews cannot hope to “win” their claims on the court of honest science and engineering. Therefore, they have turned to their traditional tool–the scribes. Since scribes of the Bible most closely relate to lawyers today, and since virtually all sitting judges were previously lawyers, Jews had a ready solution: have their “judges” jail anyone who questions the claims of the “holocaust,” including the evidence and testimony of the Nuremberg Trials. Dubbed “deniers” by Jewish propagandists, professors, chemists, execution chamber experts, historians, and others have been attacked by Jewish Law on the “holocaust,” now on the books in dozens of countries. Jews are straining to get such laws on the books in America. Given America’s corrupt and feckless citizenry, led by Roman Catholic and Protestant clergy, they’ll probably succeed. No wonder they fear Islam in America! They might run across someone with “kidney.”
Nomoonnight, 2008
