JEWISH DEATH TRAIN ROLLS THROUGH HUNGARY

Room in Ikaterinburg after Jewish massacre of Tsar Nicolas II and family.

One of the mainstays in the defensive arguments of men who clamor for progress and a “new order” is the unfortunate necessity of “cutting out the cancer” (men who disagree with the “vision”) which threatens the “new man” and his rightful future inheritance of “paradise on Earth.” It is said (and this is difficult to substantiate) that V.I. Lenin upon his deathbed rued the “sea of blood” that had been spilled during the “Russian” Revolution. He purportedly groaned that with ten men such as St. Francis of Assisi, he might have been more successful. Although this sounds suspiciously like a prelate or man of faith trying to bend the Russian revolution into a positive direction, the speculation regarding the influence of St. Francis may well be valid.

 Great organizations sometimes begin very inauspiciously. The Knights Templar are a case in point. For almost a year or so the organization was composed of some nine men. They were so impoverished that they sometimes shared a horse, and one of the Templar emblems was the image of two men riding one one horse. Yet, this unpromising assortment of lesser knights grew into an organization so powerful that the Vatican engineered its downfall.

Not only did the number of knights increase dramatically, but the quality, or rank, of men grew more prestigious. Nevertheless, these were men whose education was limited. They were above all else trained from boyhood in the craft of warfare, especially hand-to-hand and mounted combat. Some engineering skills must have existed at least as an adjunct to the warrior caste. There would need to be some level of quartermastering ability, so that provisioning of the soldiers could occur. The need to deal with transporting of troops by ship must have occupied some thought. Lastly, there would need to be some means of financing the projected warfare. In this case the “crusades” to the Levant was the primary mission.

At this time there were migrant as well as local guilds which were devoted to constructing cathedrals, castles, fortresses, bridges and the like. Smithies existed to make weaponry. Most lords had hirelings or subjects who oversaw the fields, the herds, the larder, et al. In this we see a local, limited, unorganized area of experience which could be employed during the Crusades. This initial uniting of the Knights Templar, Jewish moneychangers (and rabbis), and the masonic and other guilds, I believe, eventually engendered a momentous idea: the guilds as a revolutionary tool. This was the beginning of the idea of the “worker,” or proletariat, as a tool by which to transform the world. It was also the beginning of the radical and revolutionary Masonic Lodges. True, there was a long way to go, much required work, and the unfortunate need to “off” certain people or peoples. From their point of view, this was the price that “heaven on Earth” required of them.

While it is true that many penniless soldiers might partake of the adventure upon the promise of “spoils” (including chickens, other fowl, herdstock, ”veggies” and lassies obtained from luckless farmers near their “roadmap to war” in the Levant), the overland trail did not seem as favored as the “whale road.” Therefore, funds would need be raised to pay the boat owners for transport across the Mediterranean Sea. Perhaps the Vatican financed these adventures in “faith-based” warfare. Perhaps the boat owners were given  “promises to pay” certificates of a certain amount of the anticipated loot stashed away by the cunning Muslims.

However, I believe that the Templar organization used (and was used by) Jewish moneychangers, who may have offered a good rate on money loaned, receiving in turn a favorable deal, such as the exclusive right to finance the Templar operations at these low rates, to “bank” the proceeds of gold, silver, et al, in special secure vaults, which certain very prosperous Jews already possessed, and to guarantee through some early mode of insurance policy the amount of Templar coin intrusted to it.

From the point of view of Jewish moneychangers, possession of this vault of hard currency offered an ideal means of increasing their own wealth from this store through arbitrage operations throughout their widespread nation, composed of an archipelago of communities which stretched from the Iberian Peninsula and the Isles of the West to far India and the Silk Road into China. This opportunity was in addition to the low interest loans, which may well have been the first really “long term” loans made in Europe, which were later made famous by the Rothschild sons. Remember! This is speculation on my part. However, I do believe in its likelihood.

Am I “picking on Jews,” as many ignoramuses claim? No. One must go with probability. The best of the men who made up the fighting force of the Knights Templar were incompetent as financiers. So were their local subordinants incompetent. The clergy were not the answer either. While not every Jew is skillful with money, at that time the Jewish moneychanger/usurer and the Jewish trader were the individuals who most closely worked with finance.

It is no accident at all that the British Law Merchant is based overwhelmingly on the trading practices developed by Jews, initially among themselves, and, as Jewish trade dominance increased, their intragroup practices became a standard amongst nonJews as well. Further, these practices were rabbinically sanctioned as ethical business practices for Jews. Otherwise, it is certain these Jews would not have utilized them in trade, et al, for fear of incurring rabbinic wrath. Hence, what became known as “international trade” in the West was, in fact, a form of Talmudically sanctioned practices, which began the process of uniting religion and business under the legal umbrella of Judaism. With the advance of business as an influential force in national life, so, too, unnoticed, did the influence of the legal system of Judaism advance. 

Further, I believe that this collaboration between Templars and Jewish moneychangers was so financially rewarding for both, that the first glimmer of what later became known as “Court Jews” developed. In short I suspect that the leaders of the Knights Templar retained Jews for many other services, such as advisers on how to proceed with Muslim leaders, as couriers, as spies, and as assassins. Furthermore, almost from the outset, the Knights Templars must have used ships that were owned by Jews for transport. If they were getting loans from Jewish moneychangers, at least in part, to finance their expeditions, I believe it reasonable that these same Jews would suggest Jewish shipowners as knowledgeable, reliable, and perhaps cheap, means of transport. I believe that all the Jews involved would sense that the Knights Templar and the Crusades were a “golden opportunity” to advance themselves. Please recall, Jewry retained a fixation about controlling Jerusalem, which was as vital at this time for them as at any other. There must have been clandestine conversations between rabbis and moneychangers as well. In short, the Vatican-sponsored Crusades to liberate the “Holy Land” very much suited the long-term aims of Jewry’s leadership.

This relationship became stronger after the Roman Catholic hierarchy engineered “black Friday” on October 13, 1307. This date has lived in infamy in the minds of the Knights Templars, the Jews associated with their banking empire, and subsequently with Freemasonry. This is my view. Although early masonic guilds expressed firm support for the Biblical Christian faith, after the formation of the United Grand Lodge in or about 1717 in England, the position of “defender of the faith” in operative and hybrid lodges ceased, and a posture of faith in a “Grand Architect” and religious tolerance replaced specific affirmation of Christianity as “the Way” and the faith of the lodge. Each member was free to believe or not believe and still be a revered brother. The  Masonic watchwords of “Liberty, Fraternity and Equality” (“LFE”) ruled their social agenda and impelled their thoughts in regard to appropriate governmental policy. In time the word “Tolerance” joined, unofficially, the triumvirate of “LFE,” much as D’Artagnan joined the Three Musketeers, making four.

The United Grand Lodge of London became the “Mother Lodge” to a “boatload” of obedient grand lodges, especially in Europe. In France, particularly, there were longstanding occult and Satanic groups active. Many of these employed sexual activities as “empowering” in their attempts to harnish mystical emanations (even as do many today) for purposes good or evil, general or personal.

When unofficial “masonic” lodges arose in France, particularly those denying the existence of a “Great Architect,” then the English Mother Lodge was obliged to act. Unable to act in a way that was decisive, as the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy had done on Black Friday, the English Grand Lodge could only denounce them as “irregular.” This does not mean that some level of sub rosa sabotage was not attempted against these irregular lodges, but only that they proved ineffective in halting such lodges. Leading the charge for the irregulars was the Grand Orient Lodge. This group was composed largely of atheists and anarchists. Their agenda was radical, revolutionary, violent, and egalitarian in at least an abstract way. The Jewish contribution to the Grand Orient Lodges was very significant, which undoubtedly had much to do with the English Grand Lodge’s inability to halt its spread nor its increasing power. Initially known as “clandestine,” the Grand Orient Lodge soon competed openingly with the Grand Lodge of France (and those grand lodges in other countries) for “the hearts and minds” of the people. In the meantime they assassinated people, especially nobles and aristocrats, killed “enemy” intellectuals, and plotted unruly doings.

This sort of behavior must have irked the British, whose assertion of a Great Architect tacitly affirmed the position of nobles and aristocrats, which is to say–a hierarchy. Even today, the leadership of the United Grand Lodge of England is headed by a Hanoverian noble, the Duke of Kent.

For the Grand Orient Lodges economic well-being wasn’t very useful in advancing revolutionary tendencies in the people. Whether or not they engineered “panics” or “depressions,” I can’t say. However, the ostentacious wealth of the nobles and aristocrats on the one hand, as well as the impoverished state of the general population, created the opportunity for division, radical exploitation, and governmental instability. Writers such as Victor Hugo, who was synpathetic to communist doctrines percolating in Germany and France and who was a member of a Grand Orient Lodge, could use their skills to win converts against the rule of monarchs.

Not surprisingly, nobles and aristocrats throughout Europe and Russia had joined the Grand Lodge of their respective countries. The reason is obvious: they wanted to be part of a hierarchically friendly organization that seemed to be “high-minded” and seeking only a “better society” for everyone. This wasn’t too smart, as it turned out, because the confusion of roles (noble equals? equally noble?) led to a failure of decisive action. Masonic noblemen continually attempted to appease the forces of democracy. The leadership of such forces wanted to redistribute the wealth of the nobles to the people (where it could subsequently be gained through sharp practices against financially unsophisticated “proletarians.”

Consider Hungary, as an example.

“Although the Hungarian revolt in 1848 against Habsburg rule failed, Austria compromised in 1867 and formed the Dual Monarchy that made Hungary internally autonomous. The reconciliation, designed to appease the Hungarian Grand Lodge Masons, was fought by the Grand Orient Masons, but to no avail. By the turn of the 20th century, Hungarian Freemasonry was once again at work undermining the existing order….The ‘radical changes’ started with a concerted effort to gain control of the press. By the time World War I had begun, Grand Lodge Masons owned most of the nation’s media and began to propagandize the military….The House of Habsburg realized it was being undermined by its own Grand Lodge Freemasonry….

“By 1918 the Hungarian Grand Lodge, composed of radical bourgeoisie (the middle class) and members of the Social Democratic parties, were in league with the reigning monarch. Together, they formed a political coalition called the Hungarian National Council headed by Count Mihaly Karolyi, which unsuccessfully tried to establish a constitutional monarchy….

“The Grand Lodge Symbolique of Budapest unanimously decided to send to Count Karolyi and his Masonic dominated revolutionary National Council a message of goodwill: ‘Hungarian Freemasonry will support the new Government with all its power, since it finds the latter very favourable for the accomplishment of its aims.’

“On November 2, 1918, Grand Master Dr. Bokay made a significant speech describing the Masonic program desired for Hungary. Following are extracts from that speech:

“‘The masonic [sic] programme is also the programme of the national Hungarian council and of the popular government which has just been formed.

“‘Our way is thus made clear to us. We are marching shoulder to shoulder with them, we are working with them, we are helping them in their great and heavy , but also thankful task, so that ancient Hungary may with pertubation enter the beloved land of new Hungary which is the most ardent wish of every good patriot.

“Our beloved and highly esteemed brothers are working to-day [sic] in the first rank, and that entirely reassures us, for we know them and we know that they will carry out in a masonic [sic] spirit the work which they have undertaken.’

“On that same day the Grand Lodge Symbolique stated its feelings toward the new government: ‘The government which is in power now seeks the same ideals as ourselves. Many of our brothers are members of the Government, which is a guarantee for us that the Hungarian Revolution will follow the path of radical reforms…’

“On November 13, 1918, King Charles declared he could no longer participate in the government. The National Council immediately proclaimed Hungary a republic, and on November 16, named Count Karolyi its provisional president. Karolyi in turn dissolved the union between their new state and Austria.”    [SCARLET AND THE BEAST, Vol.I, John Daniel, pp. 466,67,68]

All of this has an eerie parallel to what was happening in Russia. Everywhere, the sovereign tried to appease and everywhere they were undermined by the Grand Lodge Masons that surrounded the sovereign. In some cases the sovereigns were Masons, also. As Masonry meant the ultimate loss of power of the sovereign, there was never any point in tolerating the organization, unless one wanted to be a figurehead monarch, as in England. [This is why Mussolini, Stalin and Hitler all banned Masonic Lodges]. Additionally, the toleration of Grand Lodge Masonry worked against a strong and effective stance against Grand Orient Masonry, since the “brothers” infiltrated each other’s lodges to spy. There was a sort of “dominos effect” in regard to the tolerance pontificated by the radical bourgeoisie Masons, which would tend to shield the Grand Orient Masons, as well as other organizations. It is likely that the Roman Catholic Church was less tolerated than the communist-abundant Grand Orient Lodge. But it was the Grand Orient Lodge that would get the upper hand in Hungary, This proved a nightmare for many. Consider:

“Leading the communists was the bloodthirsty, 33rd degree Jewish Freemason Bela Kun (Cohen). Kun was Grand Master of the Grand Orient Lodge Haladas at Debreczin. Although politcal and economic conditions made his coup bloodless, it did not remain so, Grand Orient Freemasons began blaming the middle and upper classes for Hungary’s problems, suggesting they be eliminated.

“Assisting Kun were the following Grand Orient Masons: Comrade Kunzi, Minister of Public Instruction; Comrade Jaszi, National Minister of the Soviets; Comrade Ageston Peter; Comrade Lukazs; Comrade Diener Denes Zoltan; Comrade Alexander Garbai (Joseph Pogany), head of the army; Comrade Ronai, Minister of Justice; Comrade Varga Weichzelbaum for finance; Comrade Vince Weinstein as governor of the capital; Comrade Moritz Erdelyi and Comrade Sezso Biro, for the police; and the bloodthirsty Comrade Tibor Szamuelly, Prime Minister.

“Szamuelly engineered the slaughter of the bourgeoisie while traveling about Hungary in his special train.”   [supra, p.468]

In my view the lurid, bloodthirsty characters which Jewish (and other) writers have described in books, magazines, and newspapers, as well as the relentlessly arrogant, cruel “Nazis” of Hollywood films and TV programs, were inspired by Jewish “monsters” of the Bela Kun and Tibor Szamuelly types. This is a people that V.I. Lenin (himself a Jew) described as “making better revolutionaries,” due to their ability to be cruel. From the terror of the French Revolution to Murder Incorporated, Jews have been disproportionately represented. There are no people on the Earth that Jews need bow to as “more bloodhanded than we are.” But, be that as it may, the events to be described below aren’t “make-believe” movies or books but are actual events. Consider:

“An eyewitness (of which there were few) gives the following account:

“‘This train of death rumbled through the Hungarian nights, and where it stopped, men hung from trees, and blood flowed in the streets. Along the railway line one often found naked and mutilated corpses. Szamuelly passed sentence of death in the train and those forced to enter it never related what they had seen. Szamuelly lived in it constantly, thirty Chinese terrorists (Triads) watched over his safety; special executioners accompanied him. The train was composed of two saloon cars, two first class cars reserved for the terrorists and two third class cars reserved for the victims. In the latter the executions took place. The floors were stained with blood. The corpses were thrown from the windows while szamuelly sat at his dainty little writing table, in the saloon car uoholstered in pink silk and ornamented with mirrors. A single gesture of his hand dealt out life or death.’

“Within weeks Bela Kun and his Masonic comrades had destroyed the old order. Hungarian refugees carried the news of the bloodshed to America….”                                [supra, p.269-270]

This is a very perfect description of a Hollywood film scene about Nazi horrors. Hey! Wait! Shouldn’t the story be about Adolf Eichmann or Joseph Goebbels? Szamuelly is a Jew! This can’t be true. And those Chinese must be Japanese! Some one is trying to frame the Jews. They are the kindest, most cultured, most intellectual people in the world. I’m calling my congressman!

Nomoonnight, 2008.