THE DEATH OF DE TOCQUEVILLIAN AMERICA

The generic defence by Freemasons, and their “running dogs,” of Freemasonry is that, while there may be an occasional wicked Freemason, Freemasonry, per se, is a good, even noble, fraternity. Listening to them is akin to listening to executives at great tobacco companies deny the existence of cause-and-effect evidence that tobacco smoking is harmful to human health. Masons will not admit that Freemasonry is harmful to a nation’s health. Indeed, they like to point out that many of the “Founding Fathers” were Masons, including George Washington. As he advised America against entangling relationships, especially with Europe, he must be viewed as a Mason dimly aware of the real goals of Masonry. What George Washington called “entangling relationships,” British agent Henry Kissinger declared to be “linkages,” while advising Richard Nixon, then President of the United States. Two men widely separated by time and background see the same process and draw radically different opinions about its usefulness.

Undoubtedly, George Washington was used in his time by others who wished to associate themselves with his national glory, and he was probably aware of it and a little disgusted with it. I wonder what he’d have thought about strangers still doing it two hundred years later, using their Lodge association as a pretext. Writing an autobiography is the only thing that affords a great man any sort of defence in the future, when he is gone to ground. Letters may not be sufficient, as publishers of a great man’s letters frequently leave out letters. Often enough, these are letters containing views that the publisher chooses to “stifle.”

I demur to Masonic apologists, as traitors to the nations they inhabit are not good men and certainly not noble ones. Those who do not affirm the God of their fathers are abandoned. These people gather together, not because they wish to affirm an ideal, but because they want to deconstruct all ideas to the same generic plane. That way they fit comfortably in the plane of Masonry’s watchwords of “liberty, equality, fraternity,” as well as their new watchword, “tolerance.” If there is an opinion not held by a given Mason, that Mason does not leave the Lodge as a point of honor, but he accepts the will of the Brotherhood and works to develop policies that reflect that Masonic opinion. Only on those occasions when a Mason perceives the evil within his “Tower of Babel” does he come out of Babylon. Two suchs did in early 19th century, and they became leaders in The Great Awakening movement at that time, which was sort of a great Israelite Christian call to the Most High, expressing repentance and a desire to do things His Way (to follow Yhshua).

That the “Founding Fathers” were men of dubious opinion is certain from the jam-packed prevalence of occult symbols associated with the National Seal, the design of Washington, D.C., its institutions, etc. It is likely that some men join Freemasonry for the “men only” fellowship with prominent figures and didn’t give much thought to “philosophy.” These are “window dressing” Masons. Most probably don’t even reach the level of Master Mason. However, if we put some credence to the comment of famed economist Adam Smith that “Whenever two businessmen get together, they begin to conspire against the rest” as valid, then it is reasonable to assume that widespread conspiracies existed within Freemasonry of varying degrees of toxicity across the entirety of Freemasonic history, at least since the establishment of the United Grand Lodge of England in 1717. These British Masons like to pretend that the “irregular” Grand Orient Lodges in France, and Europe generally, were the source of most of the bad fellows. This is disengenuous.

Alexis de Tocqueville was in America at approximately the same time as the Great Awakening. He travelled around the young country, taking notes (perhaps hoping to write a bestseller back in France). Certainly, there was plenty of interest in France in regard to America. Eventually, de Tocqueville had seen enough to begin framing opinions about what “made this country tick.” He placed much weight on the energy and sheer goodness of the American people, as the source of its success. He concluded that it must be due to the nearly universal Christian faith here. He predicted that if that faith be lost, the future of America probably would not be bright.

The health of the Christian faith in America, therefore, for de Tocqueville was a sort of Achilles heel. If you wound the faith, then you can deconstruct the Christian nation easily. Who were better positioned to injure the faith of the Christian citizenry than pastors, ministers, preachers–however styled–playing the termite within their own church congregations? How can such shepherds of Christians be transformed into Devil’s Advocates? The answer proved to be Freemasonry. It did not happen overnight.

Freemasonry also attempted to refocus education toward its evolutionary vision. The decentralized educational “system” of the time frustrated Masonic efforts, which would eventually in the mid-20th century with the advent of teachers unions and consolidation of schools reap successful results. With the publication of Darwin’s text “On Species,” whereby the idea of Natural Selection seemed to reenforce speculative evolutionary concepts, founded on the Jewish Cabala, Freemasonry and Jewry had a new tool by which to attack Biblical concepts already questioned by scientific discoveries. They were ready to scourge Christianity, while secretly infiltrating its seminaries and theological unions. The latter was preparation for the development of a “new Christian Consciousness.” Once a Christian; now a New “Christian” seemed to be the magical gameplan. The “kicker” was that the new “Christians” weren’t Christians at all, but Masonic sheep.

Further, Masonry isn’t Christian nor compatible with it, anymore than Judaism is. Why would a Christian nation tolerate Freemasonry in its midst? Because it is “Christian.” It is the doctrines of Freemasonry that have pushed the idea of a generic god toward whom all religions aim themselves. An orthodox Christian view is that there is only one way, and that way is through Yhshua, the Messiah of the House of Israel, and Savior of all who believed on Him.

Jews do not comprise the House of Israel, and they were not redeemed by Yhshua, although the gift of salvation through faith is theirs to take as well as any other. Yhshua CLEARLY noted to whom he was sent, and that was the divorced flock of the Northern Kingdom. They were cast aside, and Yhshua bought them back. One can only redeem what was prior-possessed. In the same place where the Most High said: “You are not My people” The Northern House (flock) was to hear: “You are now my people.” Prophecy is fulfilled.

As for the Edomite Jews among the Pharaisees (the very ones who claimed Abraham for father but who stated that their fathers had never been in bondage), Yhshua stated CLEARLY: “You are not of my flock.” Only contemporary “Christians” fail to understand the ramifications of this, as Freemasonry has long-intruded into the Protestant denominations and deconstructed their theology to fit the requirements of a generic global society, sharing the same generic god by adhering to the New Order’s Noahide “commandments.” The latter doesn’t apply to Jewry, of course, because the generic god gave them a law. The essence of this Jewish law is” Interpret things as thou think best.” Hence, Jewry is its own “law-giver,” and needs not Moses. This area of Scriptural interpretation was once principally the domain of “learned rabbis,” but, with the study and practice of business now rivalling Talmudic study as a “high road” for a Jew, the body of principal interpreters has broadened. Where they go, the Jewish flock will go. Where the Jewish flock goes, there goes Freemasonry. Where Freemasonry goes, there go the majority of Protestant ministers. Where goes the majority of Protestant ministers, there goes the majority of Protestant congregations. It seems that these Protestants are killing the thing they profess to love. This isn’t surprising, as Yhshua Himself stated, ”you can’t serve two masters.”

The Roman Catholic Church has long-lost “that loving feeling” of the primitive disciples of Yhshua. For most Catholics, faith in the church has supplanted faith in Yhshua. Hence, few nonCatholics bother to discuss Christanity with Catholics, as the plain words of the Bible are little known, nor much noted. “Holy Father” will tell them what they should believe. This has left the road open to non-Biblical and aberrant doctrines. The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin is a case in point. Not being Biblically grounded, but rather being speculative theology (and relatively modern), it has to find corroborating “witnesses” in the visions of children, nuns, et al. By much derashic interpretations the church theologians have made the Roman Catholic connection to Biblical precepts in the New Testament Scriptures almost as remote as the “learned rabbis” have made their Talmudic connection to Old Testament Scripture. Such estrangement facilitates the use of torture to end heresy (practically speaking, political dissidence) or to save an immortal soul from its erring, hellbound ways. These things are said here to suggest the unlikely manifestation of Yhshua’s Way through the R.C. portal. If it is not His Way, it is the WRONG way. I don’t believe that America’s goodness can be rediscovered by streaming down the wromg road.

I might at this point state that my perception of Jewish law makes it very much at one with 33 degree Grand Orient Mason and head of the “satanic” O.T.O., Aleister Crowley’s comment: “The whole of the law is do whatever thou wilt.” The Satanic creature in the Garden of Eden could not have said it better. In America the children of Eve “do what they wilt,” once the Masons and Jewry have given it the “high sign.” Hence, it is “okay” to ridicule Biblically-grounded Christians but not others who have achieved the status of being politically correct. Hordes of ignorant, violent and perverted individuals now run amok under the sun of Judaeo-Masonically inspired law.

These laws are promulgated through the Democrat-Republican Socialist International by means of Congressional legislation, Supreme Court decisions, and Executive ipse dixit orders. Their primary purpose is to proceed harmoniously with Masonic policies being enacted in Europe. For this reason there are now several international organizations whose numbers are swelled by the rich, by their “court” intellectuals, by royal and aristocratic “levellers,” and each nation’s political elite and “comers.” These meetings are never seriously reported by major media in the United States, due to the fact that media moguls such as “Donnie” Graham (the Graham family has attended for years) have taken a “vow of silence.” I refer here to the “Bilderberg” meetings annually. There are also Trilateral meetings, Club of Rome meetings, gatherings of Financial Ministers from the “Group of Eight” (sounds like a High Court of Finance), as well as a myriad of elitist schmoozings. All of these groups are linked by their ties to the Royal, Masonic, and/or Jewish leaders of Great Britain, other related European Royals, British Commonwealth Masonries, American Masonries, European Masonries, and exceedingly rich and influential Jews everywhere. Influential Japanese at these meetings are likely to also be Masonic Lodge members. The same would apply to India, Arabia and Africa, as Great Britain populated its former colonies with Lodges. The key here is that the Lodges set up by the British were obedient to the Mother Lodge in London, England. The purpose is to gain control through consensus of like-thinking elites, who are loyal Masons, obedient to London, and prozelytize Masonic policy within their respective nations. By this means the views of the “World Community” are shaped by Masonic consensus and promulgated to the ignorant, superstitious locals by Masonry’s obedient lodges, as well as its allies, agents anfd fronts, in a sort of multi-level marketing scheme. It seems to work..

Not this nation of the United States, nor any other major nation, is democratically ruled. It is ruled by adherents to Masonry, Jewry, and Aquarianism. Descending from these are “open lodges” such as the Council on Foreign Affairs, Neo-Uranians, Satanists, Communists, Round-Table Capitalists, tax-free foundations, “think” tanks, et al. The “academic-creative-intellectual” complex serves to reenforce them and defends their policies, attacking rational solution-solving and mocking by “art” everything in the culture to be deconstructed.

These leading elements of the New World Order of the Aquarian Age have set in motion the annihilation of the “Old World Order” (Christianity, particularly, but all others that will not “evolve”). This is to say that they plan “chaos,” fully intending to “weather the storm” in their well-prepared “safe-houses,” and to erupt in strength and determination to rebuild from the ruins a New Order. [Compare to Charley Manson's apocalyptic Helter Skelter.] They view themselves as superior beings, so it may seem mete to them that they populate the world, like Pre-Flood Watchers, wise and pedagogic, teaching the New Mankind of the New Order. This whole procedure can easily be absorbed by the Jews’ Tikkun olam (“repair of the world”), which is itself a great engine pulling the world toward the nightmare of Pax Judaica (the messianic age of Jewry).

Not so oddly, the great bulk of Protestant ministers offer all the support they can muster to further the “Grand Design,” which Masons and Jews have inferred from the evidence of material nature and their own astonishingly deep thoughts. Why? Many of these Protestant ministers ARE Masons. Haven’t you noticed how the great bulk of these people either support Aquarian projects and/or Jewish ones? They are the great reason for the collapse of the American Christian nation into the rubble of the American “Christian” (and any other creed, as well) nation. There is no longer a Christian center to hold the nation at least nominally under the laws of the Most High.

If these laws are of the Most High, then they are of Yhshua, who stated that his doctrines were not His but came from the Father. He stated that, if you love me, you will keep My commandments. His commandments were the same as the Most High of Israel. What love did he speak of here? That which is indicated by obedience. That same measure of love which a parent expects of his child. How does one best love his neighbor? By getting that neighbor to adhere to the laws of the Most High, so that he properly indicates his love for his Father in Heaven. When this is accomplished as a group, the protection and blessings of the Most High will be showered upon Israel. Why did Yhshua give one new commandment (“love one another)? Because Israel was meant to be a “nation of priests,” and, as such, they should all be walking in the Light of the Most High. Therefore, what greater love can an Israelite have then helping and encouraging other Israelites to uphold their high office. In this sense Yhshua was saying that we should be our brother’s keeper. In another situation Yhshua told a non-Israelite that “dogs” should not “eat” before the “children.” Her display of faith won for her what the Savior offered freely to all. “Eating” is interpreted by scholars of Hebrew as a metaphor for faith, at least in this sort of context. Her desire to “eat”–even off the floor–was remarkable. It also suggested that she understood well the Lord’s point. However, the general principle is that the Covenant People have a prior call upon the Most High, due to the fact of the Covenant. They, and they alone, are people who can raise their voices to heaven and pray to the Most High to recall His Covenants with their fathers. They show their love for Him by publicly and privately repenting and affirming that they will obey Him and walk in ways pleasing to Him (obey His commandments). This is the love that keeps on giving. Still, there are commandments, which, if conscientiously adhered to, constitute proofs of love. All that the Most High and His Son ask is: “Show me your love.” That’s not too much to ask.

This is a covenant with the House of Israel and the House of Judah, Since the germane Judahites were mostly north of Assyria, taken along with the ten-tribe group, or left shortly after the crucifixion of Yhshua for the North and West, the remnant covenant people, grown finally into large numbers, are to be found mostly in North and West Europe, the British Isles, certain commonwealth countries and America. Edom has pursued these people, hoping to annihilate them (not the other way round). How? By way of deception. It seems to work well for them. The Jewish anthem has been: “Start me with ten who are corrupt-minded men and I’ll soon give you ten thousand more.” So it has gone with Israel Christian, as its surrogate shepherds of today succombed to the Sirens of Whoredom. No wonder so many Protestant ministers are rediscovering Rome.